Fred Warner
Nematologist
MSU Diagnostic Services
I once read a statement that some golf courses/country clubs
spend up to $50,000 per year on fungicides. Obviously that figure implies there
are some serious diseases of turf caused by fungi. But, what about nematodes?
They too can cause serious problems but are often ignored. I’m often fond of
saying, “Ignoring a problem won’t make it go away.” Nematodes are probably the
cause of some symptoms observed on turf and are going undiagnosed. I base this
assessment on the fact that until the past two or three years we typically received
fewer than a dozen commercial turf samples per year in Diagnostic Services for
nematode analyses. Things have changed as I think some superintendents now have
me on speed dial.
Over the past few years, nematode problems appear to have
become more prevalent on golf course greens in our region. The cause for this
phenomenon is unknown but if I am to think out loud, I wonder if it has to do
with a movement away from traditional insecticides used to control cutworms and
other insects in turf to materials of different chemistries. Nematologists have
observed this in corn as many growers have stopped using traditional
insecticides for corn rootworm control in lieu of genetically modified, stacked,
seed-treated corn hybrids. The organophosphates and carbamates used in the past
probably helped to keep nematode numbers in check but with their discontinued
use, nematode populations have had the opportunity to increase in densities.
Could this be occurring in turf? Roughly 75% of all golf course samples
processed in Diagnostic Services this year have contained high to severe
numbers of plant-parasitic nematodes. At these levels, infected turf will
exhibit symptoms that many superintendents say mimic those caused by summer
patch. And if summer patch is suspected, my guess is nematode control is not
objective number one.
|
Nematode feeding damage on a fairway in Michigan. |
Cool-season turfgrass species are hosts to at least 10
genera of plant-parasitic nematodes. Typically, samples collected from greens
and tees on golf courses contain at least three genera. In general, it appears,
our turfgrasses tolerate nematode feeding fairly well. However, there have been
situations in Michigan and our neighboring states where nematode feeding has
resulted in serious symptoms. I’ve visited some greens where the turf has been
thinned so severely that only sand exists especially after top dressing. One
thing to keep in mind about the impact of nematodes is their feeding does not
result in the production of any characteristic above-ground (secondary) symptoms.
In controlled studies at MSU, the only quantitative effects nematodes had on
the above-ground growth of creeping bentgrass were reductions in the numbers of
tillers and leaves produced. The distribution of symptoms often gives a clue as
to whether nematodes are involved. Nematodes tend to be aggregated in their
distributions (especially cyst and root-knot nematodes), so the symptoms appear
as patches. However, other soil-borne plant pathogens, especially fungi, can and
often do have similar distributions.
The only way to properly diagnose nematode problems is to
collect soil and plant tissue samples and send them to a nematode lab for
analyses. To avoid problems, this should be done preferably in the spring.
Roots of cool-season turf grasses grow most vigorously when soil temperatures
are cool and due to this phenomenon, nematode numbers tend to rise as more
feeding sites are available. To avoid problems, control tactics must be
implemented at action threshold levels before nematodes reach damage thresholds.
This is an important principle of pest control but is better understood for
insects than nematodes. The key strategy is to keep population densities of pathogens
and pests below levels where they are expected to cause damage.
One significant issue when learning of a plant-parasitic
nematode problem in turf is the lack of chemical control options. Nemacur was
an effective nematicide for use on creeping bentgrass greens but is no longer
available. Other products exist but have not been evaluated in Michigan. Any
organophosphates or carbamates should provide some control of nematodes but
those marketed as insecticides will not be extremely effective. For example, nematode
populations have been shown to rebound very quickly on greens where
chlorpyrifos had been applied.
Typically, nematode control is not necessary on new greens
and tees because sand mixes are used for their establishment and these
materials should ideally be free (or nearly so) from nematodes. But, this is
not always the case as some superintendents have experienced severe symptoms
due to nematode feeding on newly established greens from contaminated sources.
Usually, however, nematode numbers increase over time as they migrate from
aprons, collars and fairways, from deeper in the soil or are transported on
plugs from core cultivators. New greens
and tees should be sampled for nematodes roughly five years after
establishment. Plant-parasitic nematodes are much easier to manage, or to alleviate
symptoms of their feeding, if control tactics are implemented when their
numbers are low. Early detection is important, remedies are limited.
|
Nematode damage on a fairway. |
If you suspect you have a nematode problem, in
addition to collecting a sample for a nematode analysis, I also suggest you also
collect soil and grass clippings for nutritional analyses. Because chemical
control options are limited, cultural controls are the first tactics to
consider. If nematodes are recovered at levels below damage thresholds, then
the evidence indicates they are not the causal organisms if symptoms are
present. However, if high population densities are recovered, action should be
taken to reduce their population densities or alleviate the symptoms they
cause. What approach to take? Well, the soil and tissue samples will help to
determine the course of action. If the soil and tissue results indicate less
than adequate levels of nutrients, especially potassium, obviously an
additional fertilizer application(s) is necessary. However, if the soil results
indicate nutrients are above critical levels but tissue tests suggest
otherwise, these results indicate root dysfunction. The nutrients are available
in the soil based on the test result(s) but the roots are not capturing them,
therefore the plants are growing poorly. What pathogens reduce root volumes and
weights? Nematodes. Additional steps now need to be taken to improve plant
health and this may involve reducing the population densities of
plant-parasitic nematodes. However, proper fertilization, using synthetic or
non-synthetic fertilizers, using a different watering program and aeration
should go a long way toward alleviating the symptoms caused by nematode
feeding. If nematodes are present, the most important concern is the health of
the turf roots. Reducing nematode numbers may not be necessary. Implement any
cultural tactics that improve root health. After all, is the owner or member of
a country club going to be more interested in the numbers of plant-parasitic
nematodes in the soil or that the greens appear healthy and look good?